San Diego Becoming an "Edible City"?
  Nancy Hughes envisions San Diego as America's first "edible city." Those of us with no palate for stucco may find that hard to swallow. But there it is, the incredible edible city.
Under Mayor Dick Murphy, Hughes is chair of San Diego's Community Forest Advisory Board. As winds shift at City Hall, her attention has turned toward her budding nonprofit group, San Diego Urban Farms. Its goals are to set aside tracts of land inside city limits for organic urban farming and to create a regional agriculture policy that would emphasize locally grown food for local consumption. Such a policy, she believes, would save energy, create jobs, and produce more healthful, better-tasting food. The average foodstuff, she argues, now travels over 1,500 miles from farm to table. "Why are San Diegans eating tomatoes from Florida when we are blessed with a year-round growing season?" she asks. Good question. Still, Hughes's dream of an edible city sounds a lot like the marginalized community gardens movement of decades past—until you consider the booming organic food industry and add another ingredient: the percolating Slow Food movement.
Read the full story at www.organic.com.au/news/2005.05.24/
Institutions turn to Local Farmers for Healthy Food
 A growing number of institutions, including schools and hospitals, are looking to local farmers to supply them with healthy food alternatives for cafeterias and vending machines. The recent edition of the ATTRA (National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service) newsletter outlines many initiatives throughout the U.S. that seek to build local food systems and increase nutritional content of institutional food. Other innovative projects to improve community health include farmers markets that sell to employees at hospitals and urban school gardens that teach kids how to grow and prepare healthy food.
Learn more about how farmers work with school districts and the work of ATTRA, visit them online at http://www.attra.org/newsletter/attranews_0106.html.
Sustainable Agriculture Lifts Poor Farmers Out of Poverty
 In spite of overall increases in worldwide agricultural production, a staggering 800 million people are considered to be malnourished, a majority of them subsistence farmers in developing countries. A recent study by Jules Pretty and others published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology and reported by the BBC, finds impressive gains by small-scale farmers who practice more sustainable forms of agriculture. The study, perhaps the largest of its kind ever conducted, examined 286 projects in 57 countries.
The researchers found that by practicing sustainable techniques such as integrated pest management, reduced tillage, and diverse cropping systems including integrated agroforestry, farmers were not only able to increase yields by 79%, but they were also able to have a much less harmful impact on the environment. Researchers found reduced water consumption due to growing regionally adapted crops in soils rich in organic matter. They also found dramatic decreases in the use of toxic pesticides and noted that carbon sequestration was increased on these farms, thereby mitigating climate change. Perhaps the most positive finding in this far-reaching study conducted over a four-year period, is that agricultural sustainability is spreading among the worlds poorest farmers.
To read the full BBC article, go to http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4716224.stm
To read the study published in Environmental Science and Technology, click this link to the publisher, ACS Publications
Idaho's First Permaculture Course Coming in April
 From April 16th to 29th, veteran permaculturist and teacher, Larry Santoyo, will lead a fully accredited permaculture course at Sage Waters retreat center in
Bliss, Idaho. The course will be taught in three 4-day segments with an overall emphasis on Eco-Village Design. Guest instructors, including Bill McDorman from SeedsTrust, will teach segments in natural building and restorative agriculture. Other topics include agroforestry, cultivating soil fertility, sustainable resource management, and building the home ecosystem. For more information contact:
www.idahopermaculture.com/
Two Day "Green Guerilla" Course on Organics in Westhampton, New York
 This two-day intensive course on organic growing will be held April 26–27, by The Nature Lyceum in Westhampton, New York. The course touches on a wide range of topics including organic turf and tree care, biological responses to insect problems, soil biology, compost, disease control, and lots more.
For more information visit www.thenaturelyceum.org or contact Jeff Frank 631-283-1915.
For more event listings click here to see our calendar in the Professional Grower section of our website.
Letter to the Editor
WTO and GMOs
Thanks for your informative article and links regarding the WTO ruling
on GMO foods in Europe.
I think it is possibly wrongheaded to go after GMO foods and seed
strictly on the basis of health risk or safety to a consumer who eats
foods made with GMO crops. While certainly these foods may not be AS
healthy, they are probably not dangerous and the global food
monopolizing companies have no rational reason to try to pass off food
growing systems that are dangerous. I think, using scientific
methodology (and a narrow but easily promotable idea of what is
healthy), they will win that fight.
One could argue that growing seed for food that is not AS healthy IS
dangerous, but that distinction must be made: after all there is a
difference between something that is poison and something that does
nothing but take up space in the stomach, just as there is a difference
between potatoes and potato chips and french fries.
It seems more headway would be made if the focus of the fight against
GMO foods was their real dangers; or at least [if] the fight [was] against the GMO
foods and seed that megamonopolizing and superglobalized corporations
like Monsanto represent.
IT IS dangerous for consumers to be disallowed from collecting and
developing their own seed. It DOES threaten the world's food supply and
viability of food production in every part of every diverse bio and
climate region if consumers are prevented from doing their own grass
roots genetic modification of seed in order to adapt food crops to be
grown as close as possible to the areas in which they will be eaten. And
it could BE catastrophic to global food production and supply if the
overwhelming majority of the seed of the world's essential grains is
controlled by one or two megacompanies that are allowed to modify seed
in ways that merely/only strengthen the corporations' monopoly over its
production and distribution and adds nothing to the seed's value as
food, or to the adaptability of who, where and how it is grown.
These are the REAL risks and dangers of globalized, monopoly produced,
GMO seed and foods and are what should be resisted by any means
necessary.
Bob Vance
Petoskey, Michigan
Editor responds:
Bob, Thanks for sharing your insights. By presenting the information about the WTO ruling we didn't mean to disregard all the other reasons why GMOs may be bad for people and the planet. I'm also not sure that they have made a sufficient case for the safety of GMO food and there is some disturbing evidence to the contrary.


|